SYMPTOMETRIC SCIENCE WITHIN THE SCIENCE MODEL
The Science Model
It is the methodology that Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626), the father of experimental science, formulated in 1620 in his publication Novum Organum.
This publication outlined his detailed philosophy on the scientific method of empirical observation and experimentation, which must be used to properly investigate natural phenomena and arrive at the truth. In other words, a credible scientist must follow Bacon’s science model.
Pseudo-science is defined as science that fails to follow the Baconian science model, making their work and findings questionable.
A scientist is judged by whether they followed the Baconian step-by-step procedure or not.
Natural selection
Charles Darwin (1809-1882) discovered the law of natural selection (survival of the fittest) on the Galapagos islands, an open-sky laboratory. This was after discovering, observing, theorizing, investigating, analyzing, verifying, and confirming that natural selection was natural law. This has not been disproven to this day.
Now, what about Symptometric Science?
Symptometric Science
Dr. Maxwell Nartey reviewed volumes of research findings from the US Department of Energy’s radiation scientists. Consequently, he formulated the first theory of Symptometric Science.
Per the first Symptometric Science theory, weak cells and DNA overburdened by radiation, sludge, toxins, alkalosis, acidosis, poisons, and toxic acids cannot produce their work tools, called enzymes. Why? Because they are on lockdown. This theory has been verified and confirmed.
The second Symptometric science theory on cell and DNA fortification to withstand all kinds of assaults on human, plant, and animal cells has also been verified and confirmed as the most efficient way to stay healthy at the bottom of the earth’s troposphere.
The third Symptometric science theory on cell and DNA weakness states that potatoes, corn, lettuce, and countless other foods and beverages must be chromatographically analyzed to identify and confirm the poisons, alkaloids, acids, etc., in them that weaken DNA and human cells, causing susceptibility to symptoms, anomalies, or diseases. Chromatographic analysis has been verified and confirmed as the most efficient method to separate healthy foods and beverages from bad ones.
Experiments on scientific cooking, eating, and living stemming from chromatographic analysis continue to confirm the universal truth behind Dr. Maxwell Nartey’s Symptometric Science, making it the best cell-focused science ever for a person who wants to be optimally healthy.
Physics
Isaac Newton (1643-1727) discovered the laws of motion and gravitation by observing phenomena with his eyes and using his mind in an open-sky laboratory to describe, theorize, experiment, analyze, verify, confirm, and reach a conclusion.
His laws of motion and gravitation have been independently verified and confirmed multiple times. Now, what about medical science?
Medical science
Medical science has no founder or originator. In other words, while people played prominent roles in its advancement, who started it remains unknown.
It is based on the notion that human cells are worthless. They cannot defend themselves against pathogens, fluctuating atmospheric pressure, sharp altitude differences, radiation, acidosis, alkalosis, poisons, alkaloids, and weather vagaries.
Consequently, vaccines must be produced to fight specific pathogens directly in the bloodstream, antibiotics must be produced to replace T cells and lymphocytes, antiviral drugs must be produced to replace interferons, anti-fungal drugs must be produced to replace enzymes, antiprotozoal drugs must be produced to replace enzymes, anti-inflammatory drugs must be produced to replace cortisol, anti-diuretics must be produced to replace aldosterone and prostaglandins, analgesics must be produced to replace endorphins, substance P, and enkephalin, and other pharmaceutical drugs must be designed, produced, and prescribed.
What makes it a credible science is that experiments are conducted under the guise of single-blind, double-blind, or triple-blind studies called trials and randomized double-blind placebo control trials. Conclusions are drawn.
The difference with medical science is that no independent researcher can conduct these studies. This is understandable because proprietary information is at stake.
Pharmacy schools have been established to teach drug design, reaction, and formulation. Pharmaceutical companies have been established to manufacture the drugs and vaccines that physicians and all allopathic professionals must prescribe.
Medical schools have been established to train physicians to prescribe pharmaceutical drugs to treat disease symptoms and perform surgery.
Nursing schools have been established to train nurses to assist physicians in their daily duties and care for the sick.
This was the elaborate scheme medical barons and alchemists hatched in the Middle Ages to take over the cells’ natural functions. The takeover continues to this day.
The opposing view
Symptometric Science takes the opposing view by arguing that human cells are not worthless. They are overburdened by radiation, sludge, toxins, etc., which is why they are weak and cannot produce enzymes.
Their burdens must be removed to solve their problem, which is also our problem. Then, they must be scientifically nourished to produce enzymes and other essentials again.
Therefore, people who prefer garbage removal from their cells, cell and DNA fortification, and cell education to stay healthy should continue to opt for Symptometric Science, while those who prefer allopathic medicine should have their wish.
Life is about making the best choice to stay healthy and get ahead.
© Copyright 2024, The American School of Symptometry, NFP. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the written permission of The American School of Symptometry, NFP. Library of Congress copyright number Txu 1-621-370, Washington D.C.
