The Science Behind Symptometric Science

Rama spectrometry introduced Dr. Maxwell Nartey to monomers, polymers, and atomic configurations. His studies on monomers, polymers, and atomic configurations led to the discovery of the science that underpins Dr. Samuel Hahnemann’s succussion.

The study of pH in chemistry enabled Dr. Maxwell Nartey to understand how acid-alkali imbalances make it impossible for human cells to function. Then, the study of valence also in chemistry enabled him to properly combine molecules to facilitate formulation.

The study of enzymes revealed how inefficient human cells become if they cannot produce enzymes or if the enzymes they produce are denatured.

The chromatographic analysis that Dr. Maxwell Nartey did on many foods revealed how the natural chemicals in the foods people eat, and the man-made chemicals in the processed foods make human cells inefficient.

The schools Dr. Maxwell Nartey attended were enough to launch his career as an independent researcher. No other credentials are needed. This is exactly what physicians and dentists do when they are not satisfied with what they studied in medical school or at the school of dentistry. They become researchers or they add naturopathy, acupuncture, or classical homoeopathy to their career in medicine.

A college degree in chemistry, physics, cytology, microbiology, environmental science, oceanography, water science, pest control, etc. is not necessary to acquire a spectrum of knowledge relative to the well-being of human cells. What matters the most is what a person intends to do with what they studied.

The sciences that Dr. Maxwell Nartey incorporated into symptometric science help explain why human cells can no longer function, or why they cause anomalies in a person.

Dr. Maxwell Nartey was not a science student before inventing Symptometry as a teaching institution.

He became a student of several sciences when he was combing books on different sciences to figure out why he had liver cirrhosis, and what he was doing wrong to block the reversal of his condition. Medical science could not solve his problem. Why continue to wait? Those who waited for medical science to come to their rescue are now dead. If they are not yet dead, they are in the worst shape ever.

Dr. Maxwell Nartey’s research took him in a direction that was different from the direction medical science took. This direction emphasizes the well-being of the cells and DNA and the production of enzymes. He called this science Symptometric Science. Then, he went ahead with this science and founded a school to teach it. This school that teaches symptometric science up to the doctorate level is legal at the state and federal levels.

Socrates, Pluto, Aristotle, and Euripides were the most astute scholars in human history. No postgraduate student in the world studies philosophy without studying the writings of Plato, Socrates, and Aristotle. Here comes the question.

Which school did Plato, Socrates, Aristotle, Euripides, etc. attend? They did not attend any school, and they had no formal education, yet they laid the foundation for philosophy, biology, cell biology, molecular chemistry, microbiology, physics, etc., setting the tone for Western civilization.

The point is that knowledge is not acquired in a school. Schools teach what is in the curriculum. This is called information sharing designed to make a student pass an examination. Knowledge comes from a person’s genes, specifically, their nuclei-histones. This is what makes knowledge divine.

Cell biology, cytology, and microbiology which are being taught in countless universities and colleges around the world at different levels up to the doctorate level, are the outgrowths of Aristotle’s foundational work. Aristotle obtained knowledge from his nuclei-histones. Knowledge from the nuclei-histones is original, unadulterated, unbiased, and balanced.

Clayton College which Dr. Maxwell Nartey attended is defunct. The British Institute of Homoeopathy that he attended in Middlesex, England, is also defunct. Part of the British Institute that was sold to an American based in the United States now operates as a correspondence school.

However, the good news is that Dr. Maxwell Nartey secured his diplomas before these schools dissolved in the same manner that doctors of osteopathy had their diplomas before the colleges of osteopathy closed their doors throughout the United States.

The Arkansas College of Physicians and Surgeons closed down. The California Medical Society and College of Physicians also closed down. 73 medical schools closed down, and the Flexner report closed down more medical schools in the United States.

Schools close down or merge, but the diplomas that were issued remain. This is not new. What matters is what a person does with the diplomas he or she obtained from a school.

Dr. Maxwell Nartey used the knowledge he acquired to end compartmentalized thinking and emphasize neuronal connectivity for global thinking when it comes to a human being. In a human being, all the parts are connected and depend on each other. This is what makes symptometric science different from medical science.

Where is the scientific evidence?

Do you want to see the scientific evidence backing everything Symptometry teaches and does? Sit tight and read.

In Symptometry, a good result is the result that the cells that have self-corrected produced. Do you know how to make the cells self-correct, self-regulate, self-cleanse, and self-perpetuate to end an anomaly that medical science calls “a disease”? It is enzymes that enable the cells to achieve this objective. Ending bowel bleeding in a person with a colon anomaly is the scientific evidence confirming that relying on the cells to use enzymes to end an anomaly works. The evidence is in the result.

How does the enzyme called helicase unwind DNA? This can only be seen with an electron microscope in a laboratory. The man-made or natural chemical that stops helicase from unwinding can only be seen and identified in a laboratory.

Therefore, if a person wants to know the science behind symptometric science, he or she must see what happens in real-time in a laboratory, or the person that Symptometry assisted will confirm that the anomaly no longer occurs. Imagination has no place in symptometric science. Only neuronal connectivity counts.

How does one know if the products work? They work at the cellular level. Do you want to see the cells at work? Place cells under a microscope and see how they react to different acids, alkaloids, and poisons.

A trip to the laboratory to see how cells work is not free. You must pay for this trip. Symptometry is the culmination of 32 years of research and applications. The results it continues to obtain are so many that we have lost count. Results can be independently verified. They are neither anecdotes nor testimonials. Now, let us discuss medical research.

Has a member of the public seen a pharmaceutical chemist at work in their laboratory re-designing the formulation for Prednisone or Ibuprofen? No, and never would this happen. This is just the way things are.

The public is not privy to what happens behind the scenes. For this reason, no one, not even a physician would ever know the ingredients that are in the pharmaceutical drug they prescribe.

Why should the standard be different when it comes to Dr. Samuel Hahnemann’s products? These products were approved in 1938 knowing full well that only those who work behind the scenes will have full access to certain details. Members of the public are not granted access to lab facilities. Tourists are not allowed in such facilities.

One can go online and read the side effects of certain drugs, but the ingredients in the drugs in question are not on the Internet and no matter how hard a person tries to find them, they will never find them. The ingredients of every drug fall under proprietary information. Federal law protects proprietary information, and the drug’s formulation also falls under proprietary information. This is the law. Case closed.

What is in a molecule? Take it to your chromatographic laboratory, deconstruct it, and know what is in it. This is how independent verification is done. If you do not have a chromatographic machine (thin layer, gas, liquid, or paper chromatography), wait until you get one.

All the recommendations that Symptometry makes regarding foods to avoid, foods to eat, beverages to consume, etc. are based on what happened in a laboratory. Nothing is a figment of the researcher’s imagination.

Confusion

Certain individuals are confused about the way Symptometry operates because they are used to the way medical science operates with peer review of articles in medical journals, double-blind clinical trials, etc. Never equate symptometric science with medical science. We are in different leagues.

Medical science abandons the cells and focuses on the production of pharmaceutical drugs, vaccines, and surgery. Symptometric science focuses on the well-being of the cells and DNA and the production of enzymes. These are apples and oranges beyond comparison. Keep them separate.

For the first time in human history, a science has been invented to focus solely on the well-being of the cells and DNA, and the production of enzymes. Call it Symptometric Science and you will be right on the money.