Dr. Maxwell Nartey
Founding Professor of Symptometric Science
American School of Symptometry, NFP
No physician wrote about New York Senator Dr. Royal Samuel Copeland, but I will. Here is why.
While physicians and Abraham Flexer held on to Dr. Hahnemann’s weaknesses, and Avogadro insisted in his bogus article that Hahnemannian products were unsubstantial, Dr. Royal Samuel Copeland, a trained physician, President of the New York City Board of Health, and Dean of the Homoeopathic Medical School of New York University, took a different view.
He separated the wheat from the chaff and zeroed in on Dr. Hahnemann’s singular accomplishment: succussion.
What did Dr. Copeland see? He saw a genius at work in Dr. Samuel Hahnemann. Dr. Hahnemann gave mankind what human cells never had: energy.
Through succussion, a technique he invented, Dr. Hahnemann infused particulates with all the branches of energy, allowing us to fill the fiber cells with energy, something our fiber cells never had. The ancient Egyptians and Hippocrates never focused on human cells, and the medical scholars that followed made the same mistake by leaving energy and motion out of human cells, which was wrong.
Instead of teaching the benefits of succussion and getting inert substances out of the human body so health and energy can be restored to the cells, teachers in various homoeopathic colleges taught students vitalism, the doctrine of signatures, herbalism, treating people according to their mental symptoms, and other nonsensical topics. This was also wrong, but two wrongs do not make a right.
After comparing his success with Dr. Hahnemann’s products with the pharmaceutical drugs he was trained to prescribe, Dr. Royal Samuel Copeland wasted no time promoting Dr. Hahnemann’s products rather than homoeopathic philosophy.
The drugs he was trained to prescribe were loaded with inertia expressed through alkyl and halogen. Such drugs made with adulterated or chemically synthesized chemicals could not repair anything in the human body. Also, they could not help human cells produce any enzymes. We are built for motion and are energy-dependent life forms, using unadulterated nutrients and resources from the ecosystem. What a wake-up call!
New York Senator Dr. Royal S. Copeland (1868-1938), instrumental in legally bringing Hahnemannian products to the United States
in 1938, and writing them into federal law
Why should a human being be treated with something filled with inertia? This did not make sense, and this explains why, in 1938, Dr. Royal S. Copeland rallied many Democrats and Republicans to his side, and with their ringing endorsement and majority, wrote homoeopathic medicine into federal law in the United States.
People must now choose between being treated with inert products (pharmaceutical drugs) and products that enhance motion (Hahnemannian products) or physics. It is either one or the other.
Thanks to Dr. Royal S. Copeland, many Democrats and Republicans, Americans were and are now privileged to choose A or B. Why should people have only allopathic medicine to contend with, with all its drawbacks, flaws, incompetence, and defiance of logic?
Despite its technological progress spanning 3,000 years, allopathic medicine is still lagging and stuck in the deep past. Does it discuss the cells and enzyme production? No. Does its research address the needs of the cells? No. Does it draw attention to the poisons in foods, toxic acids in fruits and juices, and toxic alkaloids that hurt our cells, denature and deactivate enzymes? No.
Allopathic medicine is all about organic chemistry, pharmaceutical drugs, and vaccines, with no deviation. What a blunder!
Every human knows we are made of cells, and enzymes accelerate cell division. Why must we be treated with pharmaceutical drugs or inert substances when our cells are made of nutrients and resources from the ecosystem, and cell-made enzymes divide them? This is like reconciling the irreconcilable. It is mind-bugling.
Many physicians have studied Symptometric Science and found it difficult to adjust to cell-based science. Dr. Royal S. Copeland studied old homoeopathy and did exceptionally well.
DNA was discovered in 1953, 15 years after his death in 1938, but he studied succussion in detail, and pulled through. Abraham Flexner did not.
Will there be physicians like Dr. Royal Samuel Copeland who know that pharmaceutical drugs are anti-cell and are filled with inertia, but will still focus on the cells’ well-being and energy? Time will tell.
© Copyright 2025, The American School of Symptometry, NFP. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the written permission of The American School of Symptometry, NFP. Library of Congress copyright number Txu 1-621-370, Washington D.C.
Previous Post
Next Post